Change parameters for ECAL MLDQM [14_0_X] #44930
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @abhih1 for CMSSW_14_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@tjavaid, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @nothingface0, @cmsbuild, @antoniovagnerini can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
please test |
|
backport of #44929 |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6282c5/39324/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1
|
cmsbuild
added
dqm-approved
fully-signed
and removed
dqm-pending
pending-signatures
labels
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
This PR changes certain parameters and thresholds for the ML based DQM quality plot in ECAL to better accommodate the high luminosity runs in 2024.
PR validation:
The PR was validated by running the online Ecal DQM configuration and the resultant plots were examined by uploading the output file to a DQM test gui. The new plots look reasonable.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
This is a backport to 14_0_X which is currently used in production. Master PR is #44929